Hamlet sees the ghost of his father who shows him that Hamlet’s
uncle killed him by pouring poison in his ear. Driven mad by the murder of his
father by his uncle, Claudius, and his uncle’s subsequent marriage to his
mother, Gertrude, Hamlet spends most of the play contemplating the nature of
revenge, how to achieve it and at what cost. It’s only through the accidental killing
of his love interest, Ophelia’s father, that he comes to recognize some of the
problems with revenge when Laertes comes to seek it out. Claudius steers
Laertes in the direction he wants, showing Laertes that Hamlet killed his
father Polonius in his madness. Laertes goes mad with grief too, when his
sister drowns in the river, after having been driven mad by the loss of her
father. Laertes proposes that they fight with foils, the one that he is supposed
to use will be poisoned. Claudius suggests that in case Hamlet wins, he will
also poison a cup of wine that he will give to Hamlet to celebrate his good
fortune in winning the duel. Hamlet takes the poisoned foil and kills Laertes
unknowingly, and Gertrude drinks the win that was supposed to be for Hamlet. Laertes
and Gertrude die, and Hamlet kills Claudius, then himself.
In reading it this time, I was really focused on how the
play utilizes images of nature. The poisons that course throughout the play are
all of natural origin. There are multiple indications of the dividing line
between heaven and earth, and man is considered a natural beast.
I’m interested in the ways nature wins in this play, over
all political and personal considerations. No particular religion plays much of
a role (although there is a fish-monger reference) but heaven, God and other
religious motifs are mentioned or called upon.
There’s something interesting in the ghost too, if we consider this a play of natural/unnatural dichotomies. Does the ghost count as a natural occurrence? Or is he a manifestation of Hamlet’s rage and mourning? The old question about whether the ghost is real or not seems particularly relevant here. There’s a lot of talk about “matter” and “stuff” in the play… does the ghost have a material presence?
No comments:
Post a Comment